2010 Aga Khan Award for Architecture Prize Ceremony (Doha, Qatar)
- Categories: Aga Khan Award for Architecture (AKAA) ·· Aga Khan IV ·· Architecture ·· Cultural Homogenisation ·· Editor's Choice ·· Environment ·· Imamat (Humour) ·· Inspiration from Faith ·· Islam (Culture & Heritage) ·· Islam (Interpretation) ·· Partnerships & Collaboration ·· Pluralism ·· Published ·· Qatar ·· Research & New Knowledge ·· Seismic Resistance ·· Society (Future) ·· Society (Modernity & Tradition) ·· Society (Rural) ·· Society (Ummah) ·· Speeches ·· Standards & Metrics
As we look to the future, let me mention four principle areas of concern: the Islamic environment of our work, its relevant constituencies, the shifting social and economic scene, and the impact of new technologies….
Why should we emphasise an Islamic approach to architecture? Our Master Jury, in responding to this question, has described how global forces now threaten the values of “memory, heritage and belonging,” and how the built environment can help meet that challenge….
The unity of the Ummah does not imply sameness. Working in an Islamic context need not confine us to constraining models. Nor does respecting the past mean copying the past. Indeed, if we hold too fast to what is past, we run the risk of crushing that inheritance. The best way to honour the past is to seize the future. In sum, an Islamic architectural agenda involves a dual obligation — a heightened respect for both the traditions of the past and the conditions of the future.
Bismillah ir-Rahman ir-Rahim.
Your Highness the Emir,
Your Highness Sheikha Moza bint Nasser,
Ladies and Gentlemen:
What a pleasure it is to greet this wonderful audience, including so many friends, old and new, who have helped shape this programme, and who are so essential to its future.
I am especially pleased to salute their Highnesses, the Emir of Qatar and Sheikha Moza. We are honoured by your presence — and grateful for your inspiring example, as you embrace this country’s proud heritage, while also pointing it boldly to the future.
It is hard for me to believe that this Awards process is now a third of a century old! — and that it has involved some 3500 candidate projects and over 100 prize recipients. As we complete the 11th cycle, I am delighted to extend to all of our recipients my warmest congratulations!
The awarding of prizes is in the spotlight tonight — and deservedly so. But the prizes themselves are only the tip of a larger iceberg. The Awards programme also includes a wide array of seminars, exhibitions, lectures, publications and a highly decentralised selection process. This ceremony, in short, marks the culmination of a long and lively conversation.
Many of you will remember my personal concern, back in the mid-1970’s, that this conversation was scarcely even taking place. Discussion and debate about the built environment in the Islamic world was then a very thin proposition. The continuity of Islamic architecture had sadly lapsed — weakened by the heavy hand of colonialisation, by modernisation and globalisation, by the lack of architectural training in Islamic contexts, and even by the development of new construction materials in the industrialised world. The result was a paucity both of indigenous architects and of foreign architects working with distinction in Islamic settings and idioms.
Historically, the arts, including architecture, have taken their principal inspiration from religious faith. But when art is separated from faith-based roots, other influences can dominate — including soulless technology and empty secularisation.
This situation was particularly troubling given the powerful history of Islamic architecture — and given, too, the struggle many Muslims faced in expressing proud cultural identities in contexts where they very often had little influence. Historically, the arts, including architecture, have taken their principal inspiration from religious faith. But when art is separated from faith-based roots, other influences can dominate — including soulless technology and empty secularisation.
At that time I used the term “vacuum” to describe the Islamic architectural scene. The initial goal of our Awards programme was to replace that vacuum with an energised debate. Was there a problem, how could it be addressed, by whom, and in what settings?
Notice that we did not seek then — nor do we now — the advancement of some definitive aesthetic style, or the promulgation, as one colleague put it, of some “manifesto of architectural intent.” What we cared most about was that relevant questions be raised, and that a broad range of constituents be engaged in discussing them.
Three decades later, we can claim considerable progress, stimulated by this Award and other endeavours with similar goals. We have come a long way from a careless confidence that the built environment would somehow take care of itself. We are increasingly aware that the quality of our buildings can transform the quality of our lives, both spiritual and material.
We have only to look around us tonight to see how things have changed. This Museum of Islamic Art itself represents one of the high profile accomplishments in global architecture in recent years. It symbolises how contemporary international talent, at the highest level, can join creatively with ancient cultural inheritance — and visionary national leadership.
[T]he progress we see in Qatar now is echoed through much of the Islamic world. How much the Aga Khan Awards have contributed to this story is for others to judge — but I do believe that our recipients, through the years, have provided inspiring examples of architectural excellence.
This Museum represents a commitment we have seen elsewhere in Doha — from the development of the Qatar National Museum — one of our first prize recipients in 1980, to the reconstruction of Souq Waqif — one of 19 prize finalists this year, to the striking new structures of Education City. And the progress we see in Qatar now is echoed through much of the Islamic world. How much the Aga Khan Awards have contributed to this story is for others to judge — but I do believe that our recipients, through the years, have provided inspiring examples of architectural excellence.
But what comes next? As we look to the future, let me mention four principle areas of concern: the Islamic environment of our work, its relevant constituencies, the shifting social and economic scene, and the impact of new technologies.
The cultural context
My first concern is with the cultural context of our work. Why should we emphasise an Islamic approach to architecture? Our Master Jury, in responding to this question, has described how global forces now threaten the values of “memory, heritage and belonging,” and how the built environment can help meet that challenge. This is why these triennial celebrations take place in settings that evoke Islamic tradition, and why most of our Award juries have thereby emphasised, among other criteria, the restoration and reutilisation of historic buildings. Great icons of the past must not be allowed to disappear, without an opportunity to come back to life and serve the future.
At the same time, in looking at the places we have met and the projects we have honoured, we also see enormous diversity. Diversity, in fact, is part of the essence of Islam. The unity of the Ummah does not imply sameness. Working in an Islamic context need not confine us to constraining models. Nor does respecting the past mean copying the past. Indeed, if we hold too fast to what is past, we run the risk of crushing that inheritance. The best way to honour the past is to seize the future. In sum, an Islamic architectural agenda involves a dual obligation — a heightened respect for both the traditions of the past and the conditions of the future.
The relevant constituencies
A second area of concern involves the definition of our relevant constituencies. With whom should we be communicating? The answer is increasingly complex. The architectural community has been expanding — beyond the creative core of professional architects. The list of players is long: planners and managers, engineers and financiers, researchers and educators, computer scientists and social scientists, designers and craftsmen, political and civic leaders, clients and consultants.
More players mean more variables to consider — not only creative designs, but also client directives, the adaptability of building types and materials, allowed expenditures, the indigenous climate, rural versus urban settings — and, of course, the immediate cultural context. We must be aware, for example, that Islamic populations are intermingled, more and more, among peoples of other backgrounds.
When I think of the diversified players in the architectural community, I am reminded of the impatient client who wrote to his architect: “Awaiting plans. If good — cheque will follow.” To which the wise architect, of course, replied: “Awaiting cheque! If good — plans will follow!” Indeed it takes a wonderful mix of patience and impatience to achieve architectural success.
In the end, significant progress will require the effective interplay of all constituent groups. The success of each is diminished when any of them lags — in concern or in competence. As we define our constituencies more inclusively, we can help raise architectural awareness across a wider spectrum of stakeholders.
The shifting social and economic scene
A third area of growing concern is the shifting social and economic scene. People are living longer, rural populations are urbanising, and economies are diversifying, making complex demands on the built environment. This is why societal evolution has become a stronger preoccupation for our nominating juries. The fact that an industrial complex, for the first time, is one of our Award winners tonight is welcome evidence of this growing recognition.
Our mandate must therefore include a wide range of architectural settings — not only mosques, museums and monuments — but also schools and hospitals, industrial spaces and public markets, parks and thoroughfares, and, of course, a variety of residential habitats.
The nature of the Award is to help shape best-practices for the built environments of Muslims and their neighbours. Our mandate must therefore include a wide range of architectural settings — not only mosques, museums and monuments — but also schools and hospitals, industrial spaces and public markets, parks and thoroughfares, and, of course, a variety of residential habitats.
Similarly, our geographical focus must be more inclusive. For centuries, most of our important buildings have been located in capital cities. But recent population growth has concentrated in what I would call secondary cities, often neglected by the global spotlight, but in need of intelligent planning. The same thing is true in rural settings, which have often been left to a self-build process, receiving little best-practice attention. This, too, is a situation which the Award process can help redress, as we adapt to social realities.
The impact of new technologies
Among other things, new technologies can help us address growing environmental urgencies…. Used alertly and intelligently, new technologies can help us cope with bewildering environmental challenges.
Fourth, and finally, let me point to the revolutionary impact of new technologies. Clearly, a relevant architectural conversation these days requires a considerable degree of technological sophistication, as we encounter a constant flow of new materials, new techniques, and new requirements. Among other things, new technologies can help us address growing environmental urgencies. I think, for example, of the pressing need for energy and water conservation, and of the risks associated with climate change, weather extremes and geological instability. Used alertly and intelligently, new technologies can help us cope with bewildering environmental challenges.
These, then, are four of the major concerns that I would submit for further discussion. What does architectural excellence mean in the context of Islamic traditions and aspirations? How do we reach a wider array of constituents? Can we expand our social and economic relevance? And how do we best employ innovative technologies?
These concerns, of course, will lead us to further questions. How and where do we teach about architecture? How can we anticipate and occasionally help steer the processes of change? How do we best reward and learn from those who are most successful? How can we share our lessons with others outside the Ummah?
In addressing all these issues, I believe we can, indeed, make our continuing conversation more relevant and more productive — remembering always the Qur’anic commandment that humankind must take responsibility for shaping and reshaping our earthly environment, employing Allah’s gifts of time and talent as good stewards of His Creation.
POSSIBLY RELATED READINGS (GENERATED AUTOMATICALLY)
- Connoisseur Magazine Interview, Paul Chutkow, ‘The Aga Khan’s Vision’ (London, United Kingdom) ·· (?? September 1983)
- Closing Remarks, Tenth Seminar, ‘Architecture Education in the Islamic World’, The Aga Khan Award For Architecture (Granada, Spain) ·· (25 April 1986)
- CNN Inside Africa/Design 360 Interview, Sylvia Smith (USA) ·· (20 ?? December 2003)
- Preface to the book ‘Architecture and Community: Building in the Islamic World Today’, edited by Renata Holod (Aiglemont) ·· (Published 1983)
- 2016 Aga Khan for Award for Architecture Prize Ceremony (Al-Ain, United Arab Emirates) ·· (6 November 2016)